IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NISHAN SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CR-2833-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(123)
CR-2833-2026 Date of Decision:-01.04.2026
Rajinder Singh ……Petitioner
Versus
Nishan Singh and Others ……Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****
Present: Mr. Ribhav Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking setting aside of the impugned order dated 28.11.2025 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Khadur Sahib, District Tarn Taran whereby the defence of the petitioner-defendant No.2 was struck off due to non-filing of the written
statement.
2. Briefly, the facts are that the respondents-plaintiffs instituted a suit for permanent injunction against the petitioner. On 22.05.2025, the petitioner/defendant No.2 appeared before the learned Trial Court for the first time. Vide order dated 28.11.2025, the learned Trial Court struck off the defence of the petitioner on the ground of non-filing of the written
-1-
SHUBHAM
2026.04.02 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order
##PAGE2##CR-2833-2026
statement.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not afforded adequate and reasonable opportunity to file the written statement. It is contended that striking off the petitioner’s defence at this stage would cause grave prejudice to his rights and adversely affect the fair trial of the case. Thus, for proper adjudication of the matter and in view of the valuable rights involved, it is necessary to grant one effective
opportunity to the petitioner for filing of written statement.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the
paper book.
5. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the case record, this Court is of the considered view that, since valuable rights of the petitioner are involved in the present case, it would be in the interest of justice to grant one effective opportunity for filing of
written statement in the suit pending before the learned trial Court.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed, without commenting upon the merits of the case. The impugned order dated 28.11.2025 (Annexure P-5), passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Khadur Sahib, District Tarn Taran, is hereby set aside, subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/-, to be deposited by the petitioner in the
District Legal Services Authority, Tarn Taran.
7. The petitioner shall appear before the learned trial Court on the date fixed and on his production of receipt qua deposition of costs, the trial
-2-
SHUBHAM
2026.04.02 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order
##PAGE3##CR-2833-2026
Court shall grant one effective opportunity to the petitioner for filing of
written statement.
8. The Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Khadur Sahib, District Tarn Taran,
for compliance.
9. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of
accordingly.
(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL)
JUDGE
01.04.2026 Shubham
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No
-3-
SHUBHAM
2026.04.02 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.