IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 01.04.2026 GULAB ANSARI ......Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Ms. Pooja Jaglan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anmol Malik, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Bhumika Khatri, Advocate for Mr. Sunil Kumar Dhanda, Advocate for the complainant.
****
KIRTI SINGH , J. (ORAL)
1. The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 483 of BNSS has been invoked for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 231 dated 29.06.2024 under Sections 365, 376(2)(n), 384, 506 of IPC and Section
6 of POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Tehsil Camp, Panipat. 2. The translated version of the FIR is reproduced below:-
“To SHO Tehsil Camp, it is submitted that I Bobby S/o Dhaniram R/o Wadhawa Ram Colony near Parshuram Mandir Panipat am resident of the said place. I have 2 sons and I daughter. My eldest daughter is xxxx whose age is about 15-16 years who today at about 11 a.m. went somewhere from home without informing anyone. Her description is as follows: colour whiteish, round face, strong body, height about 5 feet, wearing light black colour suit. Kindly search for her. Thank y
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.