IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.156 CRM-M-50650-2023 Reserved on:-24.03.2026 Pronounced on:-01.04.2026 Uploaded on:-

Whether only operative part of the judgment is Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment VINEET TOMAR ...Petitioner Versus INDRAJ SINGH ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Jitender Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manoj K. Sood, Advocate for the respondent.

*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 05.08.2023 passed in complaint case No. 7800 of 2018 dated 07.07.2018 by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad, whereby the learned trial Court has allowed the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for summoning and examining three proposed witnesses.

2. The complainant moved an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for leading additional evidence, stating that the accused had taken a friendly loan of ₹4,50,000/- in September 2017 in the presence of certain witnesses, namely Rohit, Shaukin and Vijay. It was submitted that these witnesses could not be examined earl