SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 27764

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUKESH CHAND MEENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 01.04.2026 Mukesh Chand Meena ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Vadit Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Dhramvir Sharma, Advocate, for the complainant.

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.627 dated 28.12.2023, registered under Sections 302, 34 IPC (Sections 201, 420, 468 and 471 IPC added lateron), at Police Station Badshahpur, District Gurugram.

2. Succinctly, facts of the case are that the FIR in the present case was registered on the statement of complainant Mahender Meena. It was alleged that on 27.12.2023 at about 10:52 p.m., he received a telephonic call from Rajesh @ Raju that his brother Mithun @ Samay Singh who lived in Mahilpur, Delhi, met with an accident in Gurugram. After some time, he informed that a fight had occurred and a vehicle ran over his brother. It was also informed that Mukesh (the petitioner), Narsi Meena, and Vikram were present at the scene and repea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top