SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8796

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DALJEET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAN SINGH BENIWAL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 02.04.2026 Daljeet Singh … Petitioner Versus Ran Singh Beniwal … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Kunal Dawar, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Saurav Bajaj, Advocate, and Mr. Devesh Bhatia, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Rupam Aggarwal, Advocate, for the respondent.

***

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)

The instant petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the order dated 07.02.2026 (Annexure P-12), passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.)/Executing Court, Gurugram, vide which conditional warrants of arrest were issued to secure the presence of the petitioner and for satisfaction of the decree.

2. The facts, as emanating from the petition, are that a suit for possession and damages/mesne profits was instituted by the respondent/ plaintiff/Decree Holder (hereinafter referred to as ‘DH’) against the petitioner/defendant/Judgment Debtor (hereinafter referred to as ‘JD’). The said suit was decreed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller (North-West), Rohini Courts, Delhi, vide judgment dated

23.12.2024 (Annexure P-1).

3. Thereafter, execution p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top