SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8809

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAMJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 02.04.2026 Vikramjit Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Union Territory, Chandigarh --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ.

Present:- Mr. Vipul Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manish Bansal, P.P., U.T., Chandigarh.

***

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ.J (Oral)

The petitioner seeks concession of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.4 dated29.03.2024 under Sections 21, 29 of NDPS Act and Section 201 IPC, registered at Police Station Anti Narcotic Task Force, Sector 11, Chandigarh.

2. The First Information Report was registered on the complaint submitted by SI Sumer Singh, pursuant to a secret information received by the police officials during the course of patrolling duty. It is stated that on 28.03.2024, the complainant along with other police officials, namely HC Anil, Constable Sumit, Lady Constable Sarabjit Kaur, and Constable Sandeep (driver of the government vehicle bearing No. CH01GA-0468), was on routine patrolling duty in the Union Territory area for crime prevention. At about 11:45 PM, when the police party reached the rear side of the bus stand at Sector 43, Chandigarh, a secret informer approach

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top