SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8852

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
YADWINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

226 CRM-M-14644-2026 Date of decision: 02.04.2026 YADWINDER SINGH ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Ms. Bindu Bala, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab.

*****

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)

1. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioners seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No.148 dated 14.11.2025 registered under Section 21(1) Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Sections 303(2) BNS, 2023 at Police Station Taragarh, District Pathankot.

2. On 17.03.2026, the following order was passed by this Court: -

“Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.148 dated 14.11.2025 registered under Section 21(1) Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Sections 303(2) BNS, 2023 at Police Station Taragarh, District Pathankot.

petitioner is not named in the FIR and has been falsely implicated in the pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top