SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8910

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VARINDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.320 CRM-M-14809-2026 Date of Decision: 02.04.2026 VARINDER ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ritu Raj Singh, DAG, Punjab.

*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition is the third petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 (corresponding to Section 439 Cr.P.C.), read with Section 528 of the BNSS (corresponding to Section 482 Cr.P.C.), for grant of interim bail for a period of eight weeks to the petitioner in case FIR No. 423 dated 15.11.2025, registered under Section 21 of the NDPS Act at Police Station City Ferozepur, District Ferozepur, on the ground of serious medical condition of the newly born daughter of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and is in custody since 15.11.2025. It is submitted that the wife of the petitioner has recently delivered a girl child who is suffering from septicemia and requires constant medical care and attention. It is further contended that there is no other male membe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top