124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: 02.04.2026 SANTOKH SINGH ......PETITIONER Vs.

SUKHWANT SINGH AND ANOTHER .........RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

*****

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J.(ORAL)

1. The prayer in the present Civil Revision Petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is for setting aside the impugned order dated 05.03.2026 (Annexure P-8), passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nakodar, District Jalandhar, whereby the application filed by respondents/defendants No. 1 and 4 for discarding the affidavit Ex. PW4/A of the petitioner-plaintiff in rebuttal has been allowed and the said affidavit has been ordered to be discarded.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, restraining respondents/defendants No. 1 to 4, namely Sukhwant Singh and Baldev Singh, along with Vinod Kumar and Sushil Kumar (defendants No. 2 and 3), their agents, attorneys, assignees, servants, representatives, etc., from raising any kind