SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8946

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP GOEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17817-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.04.2026.

SANDEEP GOEL ...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Shahil Rao, Advocate, (Through Video Conference)

for the petitioner(s).

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

The present petition has been filed for seeking quashing of FIR bearing No.0320 dated 30.07.2024, registered under Section(s) 406, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (Sections 316, 318 and 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023), at Police Station City Ganaur, District Sonipat, along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2 FIR in the present case has been registered on the statement of one Satyawan which reads thus: -

“Dear Sir, 1) That the present Complaint is being instituted by Satyawan for commission of offences under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code against:

a) Accused no. 1-SUBHASH SAINI b) Accused no. 2- MOHIT SHARMA c) Accused no. 3-YUVRAJ SAINI That the facts leading up to the commission of the offences in this complaint are as mentioned below:

1. That Jurisdiction is at SONIPAT, HARYANA as the th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top