[203] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 06.04.2026 Kuldeep Chauhan and others …Petitioners versus Tanuja and another ….Respondents Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Sahil Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. (Through V.C.)

Mr. S.P. Chahar, Advocate for respondent No.1.

****

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

[1] The present revision petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, impugning the summoning of the petitioners in a complaint filed under Sections 12(1), 18, 20 & 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 as well as the Order dated 17.08.2019.

[2] The petitioners earlier approached this Court by way of a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The same was disposed off, observing as under:-

“xxx xxx xxx [3] The present petition is disposed of being not maintainable with liberty to the petitioner to seek alternative remedy as per law, in terms of order dated 30.11.2023 in Gautam Singal vs. Anju Singal, CRM-M-58023-2023; the order dated 18.05.2024 in Varun Saini vs. Pooja Saini and others, CRR-220-2024 passed by this Bench, and order dated 24.04.2023 in Jaspal Kaur alias Pinki and others vs.