SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77056

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-482-2022 Date of Decision:- 06.04.2026 Shushma Devi @ Shushma Rani and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Sahil Soi, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Ankit Rana, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

****

AMARJOT BHATTI, J.

1. Petitioners Shushma Devi alias Shushma Rani, Sanjeev Kumar and Manoj Kumar have filed criminal revision against impugned judgment dated 03.02.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur vide which judgment passed by learned trial Court/Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Garhshankar dated 24.07.2018 was set aside and case was remanded back to trial Court for re-trial from the stage of evidence, after recording testimony of PW2 Investigating Officer, as detailed therein.

2. Learned counsel representing petitioners argued that in the case in hand, FIR No. 58 dated 05.04.2015 under Section 354-B, 323, 506, 34 IPC Police Station Garhshankar, District Hoshiarpur was registered on the statement of complainant Multan Singh. After facing trial, petitioners were acquitted in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top