SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 239

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RUPINDER SINGH ALIAS PINKI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


115+230 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-1829-2012 (O&M)

Date of Decision:06.04.2026 Rupinder Singh @ Pinki …Petitioners Vs.

State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Amarpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Binderjet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Inderpal Singh Parmar, Advocate for the complainant (POA filed).

***

N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)

CRM-824-2026

1. Application is allowed as prayed for, subject to just all exceptions.

2. Annexures A-1 and A-2 are taken on record.

Main case

1. The petitioner has filed the present revision petition against the impugned judgment dated 17.04.2012 passed by the Court of Sessions Judge, Bathinda and the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 09.09.2011, passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Phul, whereby the petitioner was ordered to be convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 323 and 325 of IPC and was sentenced as under:-

Under Section 323 IPC R.I for a period of three months and to pay a fine of Rs.500, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo SI for a period of 15 days.
Under S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top