SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8978

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUKHDEV SINGH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER APPEALS PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CW-161-2026 in CWP-688-2026 Date of decision : 06.04.2026 Sukhdev Singh and another ...... Petitioners Versus Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :- Mr. Vikas Mehsempuri, Advocate for review-applicant/respondent No. 3.

Mr. Navneet Singh, Additional A.G. Punjab.

-.- -.-

HARSH BUNGER, J. (ORAL)

1. The instant review application (RA-CW-161-2026) has been filed by review-applicant/respondent No. 3, seeking review of order dated 19.01.2026, passed by this Court in CWP-688-2026, the relevant extract of which reads as under :-

“2. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia submits that the petitioners have challenged the partition proceedings by filing the revision petition (ROR-1032-2025) before the learned Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab, wherein the delay in filing the revision petition has been condoned and notices has been issued to the respondents in the revision petition. However, learned Financial Commissioner has rejected the stay application filed along with the revision petition without recording any reasons. It is submitted th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top