SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 27835

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PURAN MAL – Appellant
Versus
SHRI GAUSHALA REGD MAHENDERGARH AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 06.04.2026 Puran Mal ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Shri Gaushalla Regd. Mahendergarh and another ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the appellant.

******

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Second Appeal has been filed by the defendant No.1 against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts; whereby suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent No.1 for possession, had been decreed by both the District Courts.

2. It was the pleaded case of the plaintiff that as per Jamabandi for the year 2009-2010, it was owner in possession of the suit land as described in the plaint. It was alleged that after demarcation was conducted on 03.02.2017 by order of AC IInd Grade, Charkhi Dadri, defendants were found to have encroached upon suit land and were found to be in illegal possession thereof. Accordingly, on 22.03.2017, plaintiff had served legal notice upon the defendants. However, to no avail. Hence, present suit for possession was filed on 04.05.2017.

3. Upon appraisal of the pleadings and the evidence led by the parties, the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Divi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top