SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77057

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAM KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
RAM KUMAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 06.04.2026 Ram Kumar ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Ram Kumar ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Shyam Singh Chhokar, Advocate for the appellant.

******

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Plaintiff is in Second Appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts; whereby suit filed by the appellant for possession (Symbolical) by way of pre-emption of agricultural land measuring 9K-16M/suit land as described in the plaint alongwith all rights appurtenant thereto and therein, on payment of Rs.1,60,000/-, has been dismissed by both the District Courts.

2. The pleaded case of the appellant was that one Bhupal Singh was owner of the suit land. Bhupal Singh executed a Gift Deed in favour of his minor son Mange Ram, as a result of which, Mange Ram became owner of the suit land. However, Defendant/respondent/Ram Kumar had filed a Suit for specific performance against Bhupal Singh which was decreed on 13.12.2007 and Sale Deed No. 230 dated 04.05.2010 was executed in favour of the defendant. Whereas, Appellant has been cultivating the suit land since 1990 and has been paying batai to Bhupal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top