SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 27847

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

284 CRM-M-71073-2025 (O&M)

Date of decision:06.04.2026 Karamveer …Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Shashikant Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Anshul Mangla, Advocate for respondent No.2.

****

Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral)

Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.95 dated 07.03.2021, under Sections 323, 354-B, 406, 498-A, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Police Station Kanina, District Mahendergarh, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 12.12.2025 said to be arrived at between the parties.

2. On 27.01.2026, this Court directed the parties to appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with regard to compromise.

3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kanina, on 09.02.2026. Statement of Investigating officer- LHC Anita, No.812/NNL, Police Station City Mahendergarh, was recorded on 12.02.2026. Learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kanina, has submitted his report re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top