SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 27857

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARAMJEET KAUR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
BALWINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER – Respondent


120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 06.04.2026 PARAMJEET KAUR AND OTHERS ...Petitioners Vs.

BALWINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Ms. Riffi Birla, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ankush Singla and Ms. Milan, Advocates for Mr. Ravish Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.1.

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral)

1. The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the impugned order dated 06.10.2025 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fazilka. By the said order, the application filed by the petitioners/defendants for summoning witnesses was partly allowed in respect of witnesses Nos. 1 to

3 but was declined in respect of witnesses Nos. 4 and 5.

2. The petitioners are defendants No. 2 to 4 in a civil suit pending before the Court of the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fazilka. The plaintiff/respondent has filed the suit seeking declaration to the effect that he is a co-owner to the extent of 1/30th share in the Hindu Joint Family property and has also challenged the registered Will bearing Wasika

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top