IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 06.04.2026 CCL ‘Kxxxxxx’ ......Appellant Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Rajat Sheokand, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Anmol Malik, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Punit Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2.
****
KIRTI SINGH , J. (ORAL)
1. The appellant has filed this appeal assailing the order dated 26.09.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat, whereby the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 81 dated 21.03.2025 under Sections 64(1), 351(3) of BNS and Section 4 of POCSO Act, (lateron added Section 3(2)(5) of SC/ST Act 1989, and lateron Section 65(1) of BNS added and deleted Section 64(1) of POCSO Act), registered at Police Station Israna, District Panipat, has been dismissed.
2. The translated version of the FIR is reproduced below:-
“"Copy application number 476-Dasti and CCTNS NO.
00013234015250477 is attached To SHO Sahib Police Station Israna Panipat. It is requested that I, xxxx W/O Vinod village Bhalasi caste Dhanak, currently live on rent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.