SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 27875

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Kirti Singh, J
Manjeet – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
CRM-M-66276-2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sanchit Punia
For the Respondents: Anmol Malik, Pardeep Duhan

Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; prolonged pre-trial incarceration of an accused with no criminal antecedents, coupled with a slow pace of trial proceedings, necessitates the grant of regular bail to uphold the constitutional right to a speedy trial.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 328, 384, 376, 376(2)(n), 406, 506, 341 and 34 - Bail - Constitutional Right - Right to speedy trial. (Paras 1, 9)

(B) Bail - Principles governing - Purpose is to secure appearance at trial, not punitive - Presumption of innocence - Prolonged pre-trial incarceration without progress in trial justifies bail - Need to balance individual liberty and fairness of trial. (Paras 6, 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is an accused in a case involving allegations of rape, extortion, and criminal conspiracy. He is seeking his third regular bail application. The FIR alleges that a group of persons conspired to cheat the complainant on the pretext of providing a job and subsequently blackmailed and raped her. The petitioner has been in custody for over two years and six months, while only four out of thirty-six witnesses have been examined.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that considering the substantial period of custody, lack of criminal antecedents, and the slow pace of trial, the petitioner's continued detention is not justified. The court emphasized that the right to a speedy trial is an integral part of personal liberty under the Constitution.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted regular bail considering the evidence, his period of custody, and the progress of the trial.

Ratio Decidendi: Pre-trial incarceration should not be punitive. When the trial's conclusion is not imminent and the accused has undergone significant custody without criminal records, the principle of 'bail is the rule, jail is the exception' applies to uphold constitutional rights.

Result: Petition allowed; petitioner released on regular bail.

Table of Content
1. nature of fir allegations and background information of the case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. competing arguments regarding bail based on custody period and evidence. (Para 3 , 4)
3. legal principles governing bail and the right to a speedy trial. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. final order granting bail with specified conditions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

****

KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)

1. This is the third petition for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 444 dated 05.6.2023 under Sections 328, 384, 376, 376(2)(n), 406, 506, 341 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Barwala, District Hisar.

2. The translated version of the FIR is reproduced below:-

“To, The Senior Superintendent of Police, Hisar. Subject: Application for registration of FIR and taking legal action against accused (1) Vikas son of Shri Ajad, resident of Village and Post Office Bobuya, District Hisar, Mobile No. 989761482, (2) Manjit son of unknown, resident of Village Bobuya, District Hisar, Mobile No. 7495091896, 93) Parveen son of Shri Hoshiyar, resident of Village Bobuya, District Hisar, Mobile No. 9996883720, (4) Sombir son of Unknown (Uncle of Vikas), resident of Village Bobuya, District Hisar. Sir, Applicant submits as under: (1) That applicant xxxxx daughter of Shri Surajbhan and am resident of Village and Post Office Bugana, tehsil Barwala, District Hisaris a peace loving and law abiding woman and the applicant is a student. (2) That the applicant passed a written examination for the Airport job in March, 2022.Accused No. 1 had frequent visits to the applicant's house due to his acquaintanceship. When accused no. 1 came to know about the applicant's passing of the said written examination, accused no. 1 assured the applicant that he will easily get you a job in the airport without any interview, because my uncle is working as a manager in the airport and the candidates will not need any training and the candidates will directly get a job in the airport. (3) That in this way, accused No. 1 kept on talking to the applicant and accused No. 2 about getting the said job done and accused number 2 said that I am talking to the management officer of the airport and you will have to pay Rs. 16 lakh and I will get you a job in the airport directly without giving any interview or training and accused number 2 told me that accused number 3 is my counter boy and you should deposit the said amount in his bank account, otherwise you will lose your job. In this way, the accused, in connivance with each other, got the photo of my current location from me in their mobile phone, which was sent by the applicant, so that the applicant could get a job and the accused also got the bank account, IFSC code and signature of the applicant's father from me on their mobile phone by giving a pretext. The accused, in connivance with each other, blackmailed the applicants and said that they are talking to the management officer of the airport and if you do not send the money, your job will be cancelled. On which the applicants, at the behest of the accused, deposited more than Rs. 16 lakh, sometimes Rs. 7 thousand, sometimes Rs. 10 thousand, sometimes Rs. 41 thousand, in the account of accused number 1. That the applicant has mortgaged her 05 Kanal land, situated at village Bugana, Tehsil Barwala, District Hisar for Rs. 8 lakh and the remaining amount was given by my family members and I gave some amount to the accused by selling my jewellery. (4) That the accused kept intimidating and threatening the applicants that if you did not send more money, we would not hire you. Thereafter, in December 2022, the accused called the applicant to Daimond Hotel, Barwala Bus Stand, Barwala, District Hisar, where accused number 1 was already present and he made me drink some intoxicant mixed in a cold drink and after which I lost consciousness completely and then accused number 1 raped me against my will and made my naked photo and video in his mobile phone and later Accused numbe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top