SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9105

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM @ VIKRAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


107 (3 cases)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Vikram @ Vikram Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent

2. CRM-M-15959-2026 Ankush Yadav @ Ankit ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent

3. CRM-M-16289-2026 Sonu ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent Date of Decision: April 06, 2026 Date of Uploading: April 06, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner(s)

(in CRM-M-15848-2026 and CRM-M-16289-2026).

Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-15959-2026).

Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG Haryana. Mr. Mayank Yadav, Advocate for the complainant.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

By this common order, the aforesaid three petitions filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 (corresponding to Section 438 Cr. P.C.) seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, namely Vikram @ Vikram Singh, Ankush Yadav @ Ankit and Sonu, in case bearing FIR No.0022 dated 24.01.2024, registered under Sections 406, 420 of IPC (Sections 465, 467, 468, 471 of IPC added later on), at Police Station Sadar Narnaul, District Mahendergarh are being disposed of together

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top