IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM @ VIKRAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
107 (3 cases)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Vikram @ Vikram Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent
2. CRM-M-15959-2026 Ankush Yadav @ Ankit ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent
3. CRM-M-16289-2026 Sonu ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent Date of Decision: April 06, 2026 Date of Uploading: April 06, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner(s)
(in CRM-M-15848-2026 and CRM-M-16289-2026).
Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-15959-2026).
Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG Haryana. Mr. Mayank Yadav, Advocate for the complainant.
*****
SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)
By this common order, the aforesaid three petitions filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 (corresponding to Section 438 Cr. P.C.) seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, namely Vikram @ Vikram Singh, Ankush Yadav @ Ankit and Sonu, in case bearing FIR No.0022 dated 24.01.2024, registered under Sections 406, 420 of IPC (Sections 465, 467, 468, 471 of IPC added later on), at Police Station Sadar Narnaul, District Mahendergarh are being disposed of together
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.