SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9112

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DINESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


104 (2 cases)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

1. CRM-M-15060-2026 Dinesh Kumar ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent

2. CRM-M-16853-2026 Kunal Bhukkal and others ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana ....Respondent Date of Decision: April 06, 2026 Date of Uploading: April 06, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for the petitioner(s)

(in both the petitions).

Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG Haryana.

Dr. Pankaj Nanhera, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sachin Jangra, Advocate for the complainant.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

By way of this common order, this Court proposes to decide the aforementioned two petitions filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner(s), in case FIR No.370 dated 20.12.2022, registered under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Ratia, District Fatehabad.

2. The gravamen of the FIR is that the complainant, namely Smt. Kiran Singla, wife of Sh. Subhash Kumar, resident of House No.58, New Town Ratia, Tehsil Ratia, District Fatehabad, who is the sole proprietor of a firm, namely, “M/s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top