SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JITENDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH JITENDER KUMAR ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent

1 The date when the judgment is reserved 02.04.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 06.04.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 06.04.2026 website

4 Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced

5 The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment and reasons thereof.

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Sunil Sihag, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana ****

MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)

1. The instant one is the second petition preferred by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.102 dated 21.04.2023 registered under Sections 302 and 201 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act at Police Station Manesar, District Gurugram. His 1st petition was dismissed on 25.07.2025.

2. As per the allegations, on 21.04.2023, on receipt of an information about a partially burnt dead body lying near a liquor vend at Pachgaon, a police party

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top