SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9168

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARAMJEET SINGH @ TINKU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *****

CRM-M No.17944 of 2026 Date of decision : 6.4.2026 Date of uploading : 6.4.2026 Paramjeet Singh @ Tinku ………….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Tanvir Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner (through VC)

---

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking quashing of the order dated 11.11.2025 (Annexure P-3) passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, Sri Muktsar Sahib, whereby regular bail granted to the petitioner was cancelled; his bail bonds and surety bonds were forfeited to the State and non-bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against him in case FIR No.257 dated 19.12.2019, registered under Section 21 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 at Police Station City Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has iterated that the petitioner had been earlier granted the concession of regular bail by learned Judge, Special Court, Sri Muktsar Sahib vide order dated 17.1.2020 and he was regularly appearing b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top