SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9169

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP SINGH ALIAS VICKY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

202 *****

CRM-M No.303 of 2026 Date of decision : 6.4.2026 Date of uploading : 6.4.2026 Sandeep Singh @ Vicky ………….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Kuldeep Singh Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Addl. AG, Punjab Mr. Ramandeep Singh Gill, Advocate, for the complainant ---

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

1. On 12.1.2026, the following order was passed:

‘1. For the commission of offence punishable under Sections 109,304(1), 118(1), 126(2), 351(2), 351(3), 190, 191(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the FIR No.212 dated 10.11.2025 has been lodged in Police Station Sirhind, District Fatehgarh Sahib. In the abovementioned case, the petitioner is apprehending arrest, and therefore, for the benefit of anticipatory bail he has approached this Court by virtue of present petition under Section 482 of BNSS.

2. In nut-shell, the facts emerging from record are that the FIR of this case came into being at the instance of Kamalpreet Singh who had stated before the police that on 09.11.2025 at about 03:30 PM he received a call from his client Jaspreet Singh, wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top