SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAJJAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GAJJAN SINGH & ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

214 RSA-2758-2011(O&M)

Date of decision: 07.04.2026 Sajjan Singh ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Gajjan Singh & Others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Nandan Jindal, Advocate Ms. Hashvi, Advocate Ms. Jasmine Sahni, Advocate Ms. Parneet Kaur, Advocate for the appellant.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J. CM-9783-C-2011 Present application under Section 151 CPC has been filed by the applicant/appellant for raising additional ground to the effect that the learned Additional District Judge did not comply with the order of this Court vide which case was remanded.

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that in the previous RSA-1390-2006, this Court vide order dated 20.04.2009 had remanded the matter back to the learned District Judge on the ground that application filed by the present applicant/appellant under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC had not been decided by the learned District Judge while passing the judgment dated 09.12.2005, whereby suit of the appellant had been dismissed. Learned counsel submits that again despite remand of the matter, the said application filed by the applicant/appellant under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top