IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAHUL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
233 CRM-M-16557-2026 Date of decision: 07.04.2026 RAHUL ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. S.K. Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Shukla, DAG, Punjab.
*****
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
1. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.132 dated 21.09.2025 registered under Sections 21, 22, 27-A, 61, 85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Section 29 of the NDPS Act added later on) at Police Station Division No.1, District Pathankot (Annexure P-1).
2. On 25.03.2026, the following order was passed by this Court: -
“Prayer in the present petition filed under Section
482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.132 dated 21.09.2025 registered under Sections 21, 22, 27-A, 61, 85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Section 29 of the NDPS Act added later on) at Police Station Division No.1, District Pathankot (Annexure P-1).
Brief facts
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.