IN THE HIGH Court OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 07.04.2026 Gian Chand ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Malkiat Singh and another ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate for the appellant.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

The plaintiff is in second appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts, whereby the suit filed by the appellant for permanent injunction, has been dismissed by both the District Courts.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff had filed the present suit for grant of decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in the rasta/road marked as letters A and B in the Site Plan. It was the pleaded that plaintiff is owner of the agricultural land as mentioned in Akshajra, and he is in cultivating possession of the same. It is averred that plaintiff is using rasta Mark A and mark B for ingress and outgress from his agricultural land. However, defendants are obstructing the appellant’s ingress and outgress by parking their tractor trolley at the spot. Defendants have also threatened to raise construction over the passage in dispute. Hence, present suit was f