110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 GURVINDER KAUR ....Appellant Versus SURINDER PAWAR AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the appellant.

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

Present regular second appeal has been preferred by appellant/defendant No.5 being aggrieved by impugned judgment and decree dated 26.04.2016, passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karnal whereby suit preferred by respondents/plaintiffs for declaration to the effect that they are owners of 2445/4080 share out of total land measuring 204 kanal 4 marlas as detailed in plaint and mutation entries bearing Nos.990 and 991 are illegal, void and not binding upon the rights of plaintiffs in view of provisions of Section 15(1) and Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and sale deed executed by appellant/defendant No.5 in favour of respondents/defendants No.1 to 4 with respect to entire land is nullity qua the share of respondents/plaintiffs, was decreed. The judgment and decree dated 26.04.2016, was duly challenged in appeal by defendants No.1 to 4, wherein appellant/defendant No.5 had filed cross-objec