SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15209-2024 Date of Decision:07.04.2026 Sumit …Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and Others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr.DAG, Haryana.

None for respondents No.2 and 3.

***

N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 07.12.2023 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Sonipat, whereby, the application filed by the petitioner/complainant under Section 311 Cr.P.C for recalling him as a witness, was ordered to be dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner/complainant had got registered one FIR No.484 dated 09.07.2022, under Sections 148,149,323,325,452,506 of IPC (307 of IPC added later on), Police Station Kundli, District Sonipat (Annexure P-1) against his own wife and brother-in-law as well as friends of brother-in-law. In fact, the accused had caused multiple injuries to the present petitioner. The police had investigated the matter and finally the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top