Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Amarjot Bhatti, J
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Anish – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and factual background of the criminal case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. contentions of the state and petitioner against the order of acquittal. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. evaluation of evidence, witness credibility, and grounds for upholding the acquittal. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
*****
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.
1. Both abovementioned cases i.e. criminal appeal as well as criminal revision arising out of common judgment dated 11.05.2005 in FIR No.67 dated 03.03.1999 under Section 306, 354 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 506 IPC registered at Police Station City Yamuna Nagar are taken up together for final disposal.
2. Petitioner/complainant ‘SK’ filed criminal revision i.e. CRR-1789-2005, whereas, appellant/State of Haryana has filed appeal i.e. CRA-S-1492-SB-2008 against judgment of acquittal dated 11.05.2005 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, in Sessions Case No. 39 of 2000/02, case titled “State Vs. Anish”, vide which Anish (respondent No. 1 in CRR-1789-2005 and respondent in CRA-S-1492-SB-2008) has been acquitted of the charges framed against him under Section 306, 354 read with Section 34 IPC and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
