SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 154

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Amarjot Bhatti, J
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Anish – Respondent
CRR-1789-2005 (O&M) | CRA-S-1492-SB-2008



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Abhishek Yadav, DAG, Haryana
For the Respondents: H.P.S. Ishar, Nikhil Sheoran

In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court should not interfere with a plausible view taken by the trial court. If the evidence led by the prosecution is contradictory and failing to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the acquittal must be upheld.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 306, 354, 34 and 506 - Acquittal from charges of abetment to suicide and outraging modesty - Prosecution evidence found contradictory regarding the sequence of events, transportation of the victim, and cause of death - Post-mortem not conducted - Forensic analysis failed to detect poison - Appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal as the view taken by it was plausible and consistent with the principle that if two views are possible, the one favourable to the accused should prevail. (Paras 12, 13, 14, 15)

Facts of the case:
The victim, a 20-year-old female, allegedly faced humiliation and harassment by the accused on the day of Holi. She was found unconscious shortly after and subsequently passed away while being transported to a hospital. The victim was cremated without a post-mortem. The state and the complainant filed separate appeals against the trial court's acquittal of the respondent.

Findings of Court:
The court found significant contradictions in the testimonies of key prosecution witnesses regarding the movement of the victim to the hospital and the sequence of the alleged incident. Furthermore, the absence of a post-mortem report and lack of evidence for the presence of poison rendered the prosecution's case unsubstantiated, failing the threshold of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

Issues: Whether the trial court's judgment of acquittal was perverse, illegal, or contrary to the evidence presented on record, warranting interference by the appellate court.

Ratio Decidendi: When two views are equally possible based on the evidence, the trial court's view favouring the accused should not be disturbed. The appellate court only interferes if the lower court's decision is perverse or fundamentally flawed.

Result: Appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. procedural history and factual background of the criminal case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. contentions of the state and petitioner against the order of acquittal. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
3. evaluation of evidence, witness credibility, and grounds for upholding the acquittal. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

*****

AMARJOT BHATTI, J.

1. Both abovementioned cases i.e. criminal appeal as well as criminal revision arising out of common judgment dated 11.05.2005 in FIR No.67 dated 03.03.1999 under Section 306, 354 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 506 IPC registered at Police Station City Yamuna Nagar are taken up together for final disposal.

2. Petitioner/complainant ‘SK’ filed criminal revision i.e. CRR-1789-2005, whereas, appellant/State of Haryana has filed appeal i.e. CRA-S-1492-SB-2008 against judgment of acquittal dated 11.05.2005 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, in Sessions Case No. 39 of 2000/02, case titled “State Vs. Anish”, vide which Anish (respondent No. 1 in CRR-1789-2005 and respondent in CRA-S-1492-SB-2008) has been acquitted of the charges framed against him under Section 306, 354 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 506 IPC in FIR No. 67 dated 03.03.1999 registered at Police Station City Yamuna Nagar.

3. Brief facts of the case are, on 03.03.1999 at about 11:30 pm, Inspector/SHO Arun Singh of Police Station City Yamuna Nagar along with police officials was present near Shastri Colony for patrolling and when he reached at Oberoi Chowk, ‘SK’ met him and got recorded her statement. In her statement, she alleged that she has two daughters. Her elder daughter was married and residing with her in-laws, whereas her younger daughter ‘R’ was residing with her. On 02.03.1999, she along with her husband had gone to the house of Sh. Dev Raj Vinayak, Model Town, Yamuna Nagar to extend Holi greetings. At about 11:30 am, she alongwith her husband and daughter ‘R’ went there in their Esteem car bearing registration No. HR-02D-455, which was being driven by her daughter. After reaching the house of Dev Raj Vinayak, her daughter left to celebrate Holi with her friends. At about 12:30 pm, her daughter ‘R’ came back and disclosed that near the office of Electricity Board in Model Town, opposite Mata Ji Mandir, about 4/5 boys who had come on scooter and motorcycles stopped her car. When she came out of the car, they started misbehaving with her. Upon her objection, one boy, namely Anish Goyal, resident of village Buria, whom she already knew and who had earlier also shown bad intentions towards her, caught hold of her, twisted her arm, slapped her and also gave fist blows. She further disclosed scooter number of said boy i.e. HR-02E-5380. On raising alarm, Gaurav Dhingra and Virender Arora reached the spot and witnessed the entire occurrence with their own eyes. On seeing them approaching, said boys ran away from the spot. While leaving, they threatened that although she had escaped on that day, in future she would not be able to show her face in society. Her daughter further informed her that Gaurav Dhingra and Virender Arora dropped her at the house of Dev Raj Vinayak. She was in a state of great shock and insisted her to bring the matter to the notice of her father so that strict action could be taken against said boys. Complainant stated that since it was a day of festival, she assured her to go back home and she will reach home along with her father after some time and then they will take action. After some time, she (complainant) along with her husband returned home and found her daughter lying unconscious on sofa. On seeing her condition they got frightened and immediately took her to hospital of Dr. R.K. Gupta. Upon seeing her serious condition, doctor advised that she be immediately taken to PGI. When they were going to PGI and reached Shahjadpur, their daughter passed away. Thereafter, they brought her back home. After the death of her daughter, she (complainant)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top