SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9212

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
M/S LANDMARK APARTMENTS PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
KAUSHALYA DEVI AND ANOTHER – Respondent


281 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***

ARB-140-2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 M/s Landmark Apartments Private Limited .... Applicant Versus Kaushalya Devi and another ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Karanvir Hooda, Advocate, for the applicant.

Mr. Ambanshu Sahni, Advocate, for the respondents.

****

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J . (ORAL)

1. The present application has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) praying for appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate upon the disputes which have arisen between the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that a collaboration agreement was executed between the applicant and the respondent vide Annexure P-3 dated 02.03.2008 wherein there exists a valid arbitration clause i.e. Clause 35, which provides for constitution of an Arbitral Tribunal. He further submitted that when a dispute arose between the parties, the applicant invoked the aforesaid arbitration clause by issuing a notice under Section 21 of the Act to the respondents vide Annexure P-13 dated 27.01.2026, but no resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top