255 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 RAJBIR ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Anil Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG Haryana.

H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

1. This revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 12.03.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind vide which the appeal preferred by the accused-petitioner against the judgment of conviction and order of the sentence dated 16.02.2024 passed by the learned JMIC, Jind in Criminal Complaint RBT No.68 of 2022, CIS No.NACT/23/2017 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of one year along with compensation of Rs. 4,50,276/- and in default of payment of compensation, he was further directed to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months. Learned counsel further submits that during the pendency of the revision petition, a compromise has been effected between the parties and the