IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on: 07.04.2026 Prabhjot Singh ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ......Respondent 106a CRM-M-72487-2025 Sohan Lal ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Prince Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRM-M-66591-2025.

Mr. Jasinder S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-72487-2025.

Mr. Raj Karan Singh, AAG, Punjab.

Mr.Asim Aggarwal, Advocate for the complainant.

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J.

1. By this order, the two above-mentioned petitions are disposed of, both having arisen out of the same FIR.

2. Prayer in the present petitions is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a case FIR No.267 dated 05.11.2025, registered under Sections 306, 316(4), 61(2) of BNS, 2023, at Police Station City Rajpura, District Patiala.

3. Succinctly, facts of the case are that the FIR in the present case was registered of the basis of complaint moved by Hindustan Unilever Limited through its authorized representative Khem Raj. It was alleged that Prabhjot Singh (petitioner in CRM-M-66591-2025), who worked as Security Guard in the company and Soh