SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9230

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJNEESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD THROUGH ITS CMD AND OTHERS – Respondent


118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 07.04.2026 Rajneesh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Vineet Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Advocate (through V.C.) and Ms. Radhika Deekshay, Advocate for the respondents.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the charge sheet issued to the petitioner. Further, for directing the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 27.02.2026 (Annexure P-2).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner joined the respondent-Department on 31.03.1997 as a Lineman and earned promotion from time to time. On 21.07.2025, he was issued a charge sheet. The petitioner submitted a detailed reply to the charge sheet on 11.08.2025. In spite of passing considerable time, no proceedings whatsoever have been carried out by the respondent-Department. The petitioner relie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top