IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

Date of Decision.: 07.04.2026 Kumari Indra @ Indra and another …..Appellants Vs.

Sona Ram and another .….Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate for the appellants.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

The present Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by the appellant–plain"ff assailing the judgment and decree dated 17.05.2025 passed by the learned First Appellate Court, whereby the appeal filed against the judgment & decree dated 28.09.2021 passed by the learned trial Court was dismissed and the findings recorded by the trial Court were affirmed.

2. The brief facts, necessary for adjudica"on of the present appeal, are that the appellant–plain"ff ins"tuted a suit for declara"on, possession and permanent injunc"on with the averment that the suit property was ancestral and coparcenary in nature. It was pleaded that the plain"ff, being the granddaughter of defendant No.1, had acquired a coparcenary right in the suit property by virtue of the amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, 2005. It was further alleged that defendant No.1, without any legal necessity and without having any exclusive r