SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9248

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SADDAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.218 CRM-M-14403-2026 Decided on : 07.04.2026 Saddam ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL ***

Present : Mr. Zeeshan Khan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chhina, Senior DAG, Haryana ***

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL , J (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.109 dated 04.04.2023, registered under Sections 420 and 407 IPC, at Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari.

2. Brief facts, as per the prosecution case, are that the petitioner alongwith co-accused committed theft of goods from the truck bearing registration No.RJ-32GC-3204. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further contends that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are false and he has no concern with the said incident. It has also been contended that the petitioner has been nominated as an accused only on the basis of disclosure statement made by co-acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top