SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9276

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DILMICK LAMBA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1037-2026 Decided on: 07.04.2026 DILMICK LAMBA …...Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER …...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate, and Ms. Tamanna Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

****

SANJAY VASHISTH, J.

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 15 dated 23.01.2014 (P-1), under Sections 406, 420 IPC, registered at Police Station Phase -1, SAS Nagar, Punjab.

2. On 13.01.2026, following order was passed:-

“i) Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 15 dated 23.01.2014(P-1), under Sections 406, 420 IPC, registered at Police Station Phase -1, SAS Nagar, Punjab.

ii) As per allegations in the FIR, complainant had allegedly paid an amount of Rs. 7,95,451/- to the petitioner for facilitating the payment of the insured amount for the damage of goods, somewhere in the year 2013. Petitioner neither repaid the amount nor fulfilled the assurance given to the complainant. On the registration of the impugned FIR, petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top