SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9319

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMAN RAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16224-2026 Date of decision: 07.04.2026 AMAN RAJ ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA& ANR. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Bhanu Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chhina, Sr. DAG Haryana.

..…

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.287 dated 18.11.2025 registered under Section 24 of the Immigration Act and Sections 143(2), 316(2), 318(4), 351(2) BNS, 2023 at Police Station Siwani, District Bhiwani.

2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner cheated the complainant to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- on the pretext of arranging a job in abroad and thereafter sold the petitioner in Myanmar to the persons engaged in fraudulent activities who further demanded 10,000 U.S. Dollars to release him. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no concern with the alleged fraud. He further submits that there is not even

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top