SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9324

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PREM SINGH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 07.04.2026 PREM SINGH AND ANOTHER ...... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Akshay Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners.

*****

SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral)

1. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, seeking for quashing of orders dated 03.02.2026 & 16.03.2026 (Annexures P-1 & P-2) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, hereinafter referred to as ‘trial Court’ only. By virtue of abovementioned order, the bail of petitioners was cancelled and their bail bonds were forfeited to the state. As a result thereof, to procure their presence in the Court, their warrants of arrest were issued.

2. Notice of motion.

3. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with. No formal reply has been filed by the State. However the learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition.

4. It has been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top