IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kuldeep & others ...Petitioner(s).

Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent(s).

Judgment Judgment Operative Part Uploaded on reserved on pronounced on Pronounced or full

11.03.2026 07.04.2026 Fully pronounced 07.04.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. Sumit Ruhal, Advocate for the appellant(s).

Mr. Shiva Khurmi, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Nilesh Kant Goyal, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate for the complainant.

----

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections

137 19.4.2016 Madlauda, District Panipat 323, 324, 307, 506 read with Section

34 IPC

1. This appellant-convicts, had come up before this Court by filing the present appeal seeking setting aside of their conviction and order of sentence passed against them.

2. Vide order dated 26.11.2019, the present appeal was admitted and the order dated 06.11.2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat, granting interim suspension of sentence of the appellant(s), was ordered to remain operative during the pendency of the appeal.

3. During the pendency of the present appeal, the appellant-convicts filed application i.e. CRM-43934-202