SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9336

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BALDEV SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (131)

Date of Decision:-07.04.2026 JASPAL SINGH … Petitioner Versus BALDEV SINGH ... Respondents -.-

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. H.S. Dhindsa, Advocate, for the petitioner.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. By way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the orders dated 20.03.2026 and 16.07.2024 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Batala (hereinafter referred to as the “learned Trial Court”), whereby the application filed by the petitioner (respondent before the learned Trial Court) for summoning, recalling, and cross-examining witnesses, namely AW-1 Baldev Singh and AW-2 Harmandeep Singh, has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that AW-1 Baldev Singh and AW-2 Harmandeep Singh were examined-in-chief on 24.11.2023. Thereafter, vide order dated 16.07.2024, the learned Trial Court observed that the evidence of the said witnesses stood concluded in view of the adjournments earlier sought by the petitioner. Subsequently, an application for recalling the aforesaid witnesses for the purpose of cross-examination was file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top