SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9381

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJIV LOCHAN GAUTAM & ANR – Appellant
Versus
RAVI KANT & ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2385-2026 Date of decision: 08.04.2026 Rajiv Lochan Gautam and Another ...Petitioners Versus Ravi Kant and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Ms. Harkirat Kaur, Advocate, for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.

****

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL , J. (Oral)

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, for setting aside the impugned order dated 05.03.2026 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), NRI Court, Jalandhar (Annexure P-5), whereby the application filed by the petitioners for rejecting/discarding the affidavit of PW-5 Ravi Kant in Civil Suit No. 4233 of 2023 titled as “Ravi Kant and another versus Rajeev Lochan Gautam and another” has been dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent No.1-Ravi Kant, along with another, instituted a suit for possession of the suit property and also sought a declaration to the effect that they are joint owners thereof. In addition, relief of recovery of mesne profits as well as permanent injunction against the present petitioners and others in respect of the su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top