dated 17.07.2018 was placed on record before this Court. Thereafter, on 08.08.2018, Kasam son of Ayub and Mamen wife of Zuber, both the injured in the present case, appeared before this Court and made their statements on solemn affirmation. They stated on oath that the appellants are also residents of same village and they were closely related to each other. Even, the dispute between them and the appellants had been amicably settled and no ill-will and grudge was left in the minds of either of them on one hand and the appellants/convicts on the other hand. Moreover, they had entered into a compromise and they had no grievance in case both the appellants/convicts are granted any benefit by this Court. Even during the course of arguments today, learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the parties are living peacefully in the village since the last several years and they may be allowed to compound the offences in the present case.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant/injured, also submits that the parties had entered into a compromise and he has no objection in case appellants are ordered to be acquitted by this Court.

4. I have heard