SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9429

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (210)

Date of decision: 08.04.2026 (1) CRM-M-6640-2026 (O & M)

Sunil .... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ...Respondent (2) CRM-M-6959-2026 (O & M)

Navdeep .... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Lathwal, Advocate (CRM-M-6959-2026), Mr. Kapish Singla, Advocate (CRM-M-6640-2026)

for the petitioners.

Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG, Haryana.

*****

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)

This order shall dispose of two criminal miscellaneous petitions i.e. CRM-M-6640-2026 and CRM-M-6959-2026 as they arise out of the same FIR.

2. The petitioners, namely, Sunil (in CRM-M-6640-2026) and Navdeep (in CRM-M-6959-2026) seek the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of BNSS in case bearing FIR No.14 dated 26.05.2025 under Sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC and Sections 13(1)(c)

and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, registered at Police Station Anti-Corruption Rohtak, District Rohtak, Haryana.

3. The learned counsels for the petitioners contend that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. The primary allegations are against one Mainpal.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top