SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 228

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
STATE OF HY. – Appellant
Versus
AMRIK SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH State of Haryana and another .....Appellants Versus Amrik Singh (deceased) through LRs and another .....Respondents

1. Reserved on : 18.02.2026 2. Pronounced on : 08.04.2026 3. Uploaded on the website : 09.04.2026

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is : Full pronounced or full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full : Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Argued by: Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana, for the appellants.

Mr. Inderjeet Singh, Advocate for the respondents.

****

NAMIT KUMAR , J .

1. The appellants/defendants-State of Haryana are in Regular Second Appeal before this Court challenging the judgment and decree dated 14.08.1997, passed by learned First Appellate Court, whereby the appeal preferred by the respondents/plaintiff, has been accepted and the judgment and decree dated 21.11.1995, passed by learned Trial Court has been set aside and the suit of the respondents/plaintiff has been decreed.

2. Parties to the lis hereinafter shall be referred to by their original position before the learned Trial Court.

3. The brief facts of the ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top