SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 28027

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGMAL SINGH AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent



230 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 08.04.2026 Jagmal Singh and Others ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Sr. DAG Haryana for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kushaldeep K. Manchanda, Advocate for respondent No.6.

Mr. Shyam Singh Chhokar, Advocate for respondent No.7.

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)

1. Present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction quashing the order dated

23.12.2024 (Annexure P-7).

2. Briefly the facts relevant to the present lis are that the Government of Haryana launched a Scheme on 01.02.2008 (Annexure P-1) for allotment of 100 sq. yards residential plots to the Scheduled Castes Families and other castes living below the poverty line under the Mahatma Gandhi Gramin Basti Yojna. As per the Scheme issued by the Government of Haryana, Gram Panchayat Kathwala passed a resolution dated 04.03.2008 (Annexure P-2) whereby it was decided to allot 100 sq. yards plots to the Scheduled Castes Families and other castes living below the poverty line under the Mahatma Gandhi Gramin Basti Yojna. The Deputy Commissioner, Yamuna Nagar issued a letter dated 07.03.2008 (Annexure P-3) to all the Block Development and Panchayat Officers, Yamuna Nagar for implementing the Scheme of allotting the plots of 100 sq. yards to the eligible people living below the poverty line. A Committee was also constituted for receiving the applications from the eligible candidates which Committee was headed by the Sarpanch of the village, Patwari, Gram Sachiv, Principal of the School and Nambardar of the village. Gram Panchayat received applications for allotment of 100 sq. yards plots from the eligible candidates. The Gram Panchayat found 58 persons eligible for allotment of 100 sq. yards plots. Thereafter, a layout plan was prepared alongwith a list of eligible candidates by the Committee headed by the Sarpanch of the village. A writ petition came to be filed being CWP-20703-2008 titled ‘Jagir Singh & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors.’ wherein the prayer was that the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat and other respondent authority therein be directed not to carve out 100 sq. yards residential plots as per the Policy of the Government dated 01.02.2008 as the land in question was reserved during the consolidation for the purpose of income of the Gram Panchayat by the Consolidation Authority. The said writ petition came to be disposed off vide order dated 16.12.2023 (Annexure P-5) and the petitioners therein were relegated to their alternate remedy of either filing a statutory appeal or approaching the civil court by filing a declaratory suit. Admittedly, till date the petitioners therein have not filed a declaratory suit or a statutory appeal. After disposal of the petition being CWP-20703-2008, the petitioners herein sent an application/legal notice dated 29.05.2024 (Annexure P-6) that 100 sq. yards plots be allotted to them as they had been found eligible under the Scheme issued by the Government of Haryana on 01.02.2008. The said application/legal notice has been dismissed by respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, Yamuna Nagar vide order dated 23.12.2024 (Annexure P-7) holding that the allotment of 100 sq. yards plots had been cancelled by this Court vide order dated 16.12.2023 passed in CWP-20703-2008 titled ‘Jagir Singh & Ors. vs. State of Haryana &

Ors.’. Hence, the present writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner has totally misread the order dated 16.12.2023 passed by this Court in CWP-20703-2008 whereby this Court while disposing off the said writ petition had relegated the petitioners therein to file the statutory appeal or to approach the civil court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top