SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9469

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SATBIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Satbir ….Petitioner versus State of Haryana and another ….Respondents Date of decision: April 08, 2026 Date of Uploading: April 08, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Manjeet Gharhwal, Advocate for Mr. Sahil Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana.

Mr. Deepak Kundu, Advocate for the complainant.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

Present appeal has been filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘SC/ST Act’) for grant of regular bail to the appellant, in case bearing FIR No.147 dated 16.08.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 3 of the SC/ST Act, 1985, at Police Station Sadar, Panipat.

2. The gravamen of allegations against the appellant is that the complainant, namely, Suresh Kumar alleged that the appellant along with his co- accused – Pawan had brutally given fist and kick blows to his brother (Naresh) and due to which, he died.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that a bare perusal of the FIR would reveal that the allegati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top