SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9510

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SONU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

214 CRM-M-9807-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 08.04.2026 Sonu ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. J. S. Bhinder, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab.

MANISHA BATRA, J.(Oral)

1. The instant one is the second petition that has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 446 dated 09.10.2024, registered under Sections 22 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act’) at Police Station City Barnala, District Barnala. His previous petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 27.11.2025.

2. Brief facts of the case relevant for the disposal of the present petition are that on 09.10.2024, on the basis of a secret information, the petitioner along with co-accused Veer Kaur, Gurmail Singh @ Gola, Satnam Singh @ Satti and Baljinder Singh @ Kaka was apprehended by a police party and recovery of 900 loose intoxicant tablets was effected from their joint conscious possession. On personal search of the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top