SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURDEEP SINGH @ SARDEEP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SURJIT SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***

CR-7444-2024(O&M)

Date of decision : 09.04.2026 Surdeep Singh @ Sardeep Singh ... Petitioner Versus Surjit Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Prateek Sodhi, Advocate (through V.C.) and Ms.Yukta Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Harminder Singh, Advocate and Mr.Damanjeet Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2.

VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)

1. This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 02.12.2024 (Annexure P-7) passed by the trial Court vide which the application under Section 151 CPC filed by the petitioner seeking permission to file additional affidavit of plaintiff witnesses has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner along with proforma respondent no.3 had filed a suit for declaration and after the suit was filed, the first amendment was allowed and in paragraph 2 of the said amended plaint, the plaintiff has made the following averments:-

“2. That, the plaintiffs were the exclusive owner of land bearing

Khasra No. 63//7/1/2/1 measuring 4 Kanals 12 Marlas which is situ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top